<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jim ridolfo &#187; travel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rid.olfo.org/category/travel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rid.olfo.org</link>
	<description>rhetoric, technology, practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Archive 2.0 whitepaper is now available</title>
		<link>http://rid.olfo.org/2009/09/archive-2-0-whitepaper-is-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://rid.olfo.org/2009/09/archive-2-0-whitepaper-is-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ridolfo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samaritans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archive 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community centered design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wide research center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rid.olfo.org/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This project explores the benefits and challenges of pursuing a community-centered design approach for digital archives, a process we term an "archive 2.0" model of development. Our team aimed to create a new online archive which would include select pages from three fifteenth-century Samaritan Pentateuchs. As the name "archive 2.0" implies, we embrace both the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rid.olfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/archivelogo.png"><img src="http://rid.olfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/archivelogo-300x135.png" alt="archivelogo" title="archivelogo" width="300" height="135" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-239" /></a></p>
<p>This project explores the benefits and challenges of pursuing a community-centered design approach for digital archives, a process we term an "archive 2.0" model of development. Our team aimed to create a new online archive which would include select pages from three fifteenth-century Samaritan Pentateuchs. As the name "archive 2.0" implies, we embrace both the technologies and the expanded possibilities for user participation associated with Web 2.0. More than simply adding the technological affordances of Web 2.0 to a traditional archive, however, our project uses these technological capabalities as a heuristic for reconsidering the very nature of an archive, both what it is and what it does. Unlike many existing digital, scholarly archive projects aimed at an audience of other archivists, from the very beginning our project has focused on engaging with the cultural and scholarly stakeholders associated with a particular collection of texts and artifacts....<a href="http://wide.msu.edu/content/archive">read the rest here</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rid.olfo.org/2009/09/archive-2-0-whitepaper-is-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rhetoric of place: Terezin concentration camp</title>
		<link>http://rid.olfo.org/2009/08/the-rhetoric-of-place/</link>
		<comments>http://rid.olfo.org/2009/08/the-rhetoric-of-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ridolfo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[czech republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holocaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rid.olfo.org/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I took the bus from Prague to the Terezin (Theresienstadt) concentration camp. The camp is famous for its infamous role in Nazi propaganda films. Hitler portrayed Terezin to the world as an idyllic, hospitable village for its Jewish prisoners. The reality, of course, was far from the case. On the one occasion when the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I took the bus from Prague to the Terezin (Theresienstadt) concentration camp. The camp is famous for its infamous role in Nazi propaganda films.<a href="http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/terezin.html"> Hitler portrayed Terezin to the world as an idyllic, hospitable village for its Jewish prisoners. The reality, of course, was far from the case. On the one occasion when the Red Cross was allowed to visit Terezin, the Nazis made the Jewish prisoners dress up in the costumes of everyday Czech life: bakers, candy shop owners, etc. The ruse worked, and the world remained fooled for several more years. </a></p>
<p>Two things struck me on my visit to Terezin. The first was perhaps unintentional, but in the middle of a former execution field there are fruit bearing trees. The pears were ripe for the picking, and on the ground yellow jackets swarmed around the fallen fruit:<br />
<center><br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2449/3858804016_4801d5aeea.jpg" width="415" height="277" alt="execution field" /></a><br />
</center><br />
<span id="more-97"></span><br />
The second, and for me the most disturbing modern aspect of Terezin was not the souvenir shop, I had expected the existence of such an oddity, but the cafe and restaurant. While the restaurant wasn't a corporate establishment by any means, I still felt that its very existence poses a contradiction to the otherwise memorial atmosphere of the camp.  Do tourists really need to eat... even in the middle of a concentration camp?  </p>
<p>What do you think? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rid.olfo.org/2009/08/the-rhetoric-of-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
